Judge Merchan Admits Stormy Daniels Is ‘Difficult to Control’ During Trump’s Hush Money Trial

The judge in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial rejected a mistrial Tuesday after porn star Stormy Daniels offered an explicit version of a sexual encounter with Trump that he has said never happened.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche said Daniels’ claim that there was an “imbalance of power” at the time of the alleged encounter could unfairly “inflame the jury,” according to the New York Post.

“It’s extremely prejudicial to insert safety concerns in a trial about business records,” he said.

“The issue is she has testified today about consent, about danger — that’s not the point of this case. That’s not the point of her testimony,” he said. “How can you unring that bell?”

Trending:

Ohio State Graduates Suffer Through ‘The Worst Commencement Address in the History of Commencement Addresses’

Judge Juan Merchan rejected a bid for a mistrial but commented “that there are some things that would have been better left unsaid.”

He then threw a prop to the prosecution, noting, “I believe that the witness was very difficult to control.”

And he also blamed the defense, saying, “I was surprised there were not more objections to this testimony.”

Do you think Trump is innocent?

During her testimony, Merchan advised prosecutors, “The degree of detail that we’re going into here is just unnecessary.”

At one point, he told Daniels, “Please keep the answers short, just listen to the question, and answer the question.”

In an Op-Ed for the New York Post, legal scholar Jonathan Turley said Merchan was quite happy to allow Daniels to humiliate Trump.

“He allowed the prosecutors to get into the details of the affair despite the immateriality of the evidence to any criminal theory,” he wrote, adding, “It is also uncontested that Trump wanted to pay to get the story (and other stories, including untrue allegations) from being published.”

Related:

Georgia Appeals Court Gives Trump Great News in His Fight Against Fani Willis

“The value of the testimony was entirely sensational and gratuitous, yet Merchan was fine with humiliating Trump. Daniels’ testimony was a dumpster fire in the courtroom,” he wrote.

He wrote that Daniels was “in her element in Merchan’s courtroom.”

“In New York, the relevance or credibility of witnesses like Daniels is largely immaterial,” he explained.

Turley wrote that it was “a bit late for the court to express shock over her testimony. It is not the witness, but the case that seems increasingly obscene.”


An Important Message from Our Staff:

 

We who work here at The Western Journal have fought for years against Big Tech and the elites who want to shut us down and then shut America down. 

 

Make no mistake — nothing will be the same after November 2024. Will you help us fight? Will you help us expose the America-hating elites who will do everything they can to steal this election? 

 

We’re a small group of people fighting to save the country for our readers and for our own family and friends. Can we count on your help?

 

At this point, Big Tech has cut off our access to 90% of advertisers. Imagine if someone took 90% of your paycheck and there was nothing you could do. They’re trying to starve us out.

 

Donations from readers like you have literally helped keep our lights on, and we need you now more than ever. 

 

We operate on a shoestring budget, but with that budget, we terrify the globalists. Please help us continue the fight. Stand with us, and we will never surrender.

 

Thank you for reading The Western Journal and for believing in America. 

 

It is a pleasure to serve you.

 

P.S. Please don’t let the America-hating left win. Stand with us today!



Source link