Many people have to read history to understand colonialism — how it looked and felt. However, for those in the Third World, colonialism is a living experience, courtesy of restrictive energy policies forced upon them by Western political leaders.
This modern form of enslavement — to the West’s so-called green agenda — is variously known as climate colonialism, carbon imperialism and other monikers. Whatever the nomenclature, the reality is suppression of access to fossil fuel energy sources in the name of saving the planet from a made-up climate emergency.
The effect of this imposed energy crisis on developing countries is lethal and quick. What climate-woke politicians decide in their temperature-regulated offices in Europe and North America has disastrous consequences for the world’s poor who live — and die — without reliable electricity, running water, washing machines, refrigerators, ovens and hospitals connected to a power grid.
Societal objectives supposedly cherished in the West — from improving one’s livelihood to empowering women — are sacrificed to the anti-fossil fuel activism of the colonialists.
John Kerry, the Biden administration’s special presidential envoy for climate change, has asked African leaders to limit the role of natural gas to be a short-term replacement for coal and oil. Kerry expressed reservations about long-term gas projects because he believes that their CO2 emissions are problematic.
The authoritarian drumbeat from the likes of Kerry has led the prime minister of India to call out the “colonial mindset” of Western leaders who continue to suppress access to affordable and reliable energy in sovereign nations.
The issue was also brought up in a recent political conference in which Russia, China, India and other countries expressed deep concerns about the coercion of restrictive Western energy policies.
The most astonishing aspect of these persistent calls to reduce Third World consumption of fossil fuels is that they come from people with some of the highest CO2 emissions. For example, Kerry’s family owns a private jet and multiple mansions, with emissions higher than that of thousands of villages in Africa and Asia.
According to data obtained by the media in July, the Kerry jet, a Gulfstream GIV-SP, “has made a total of 48 trips lasting more than 60 hours and emitted an estimated 715,886 pounds, or 325 metric tons, of carbon since President [Joe] Biden was sworn into office.” Reports indicate that the jet “produced 30 times more carbon in 2021 than an average vehicle.”
So, on what moral ground do politicians like Kerry ask the poor to reduce emissions? What authority do they have to deny energy liberation to 620 million Africans still without electricity?
This fathomless level of hypocrisy was displayed during the recent energy crisis in Europe. European preachers turned to coal and oil when the Russian gas supply was interrupted. National leaders who had discouraged poor countries from using fossil fuels turned to the very same countries to produce and export fossil fuels to European shores.
Wealthy Western economies return to fossil fuels because neither wind nor solar can meet the energy demands of modern society. Only fossil fuels, hydroelectric and nuclear can. Yet wealthy climate elitists somehow feel it is necessary for the Third World to forgo the coal and oil that enabled the growth of Western economies during the last couple of centuries.
According to the International Monetary Fund, the U.K., whose economy constitutes approximately 3.2 percent of global gross domestic product, has lifted a ban on fracking to secure long-term hydrocarbon production. Meanwhile, Africa, with a GDP share of about 2.9 percent, is being pressed to give up gas projects and embrace abject poverty.
Vijaya Ramachandran, director for energy and development at the Breakthrough Institute, says, “Africans must not be the target of climate colonialism. Alignment with the Paris Agreement is becoming code for banning critical energy projects in very poor countries.”
As Syd Lucas puts it, “We cannot let climate colonialists rip the rug out from under these developing countries as they are growing and developing their energy industry.”
Climate colonialism threatens to usher in a period of sustained poverty, wiping out decades of economic progress in just a few years.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
